Feb. 2004: Grewal writes to The Now against C-250
Surrey MP only reflecting views of his constituents
Re: "MP accused of fear-mongering," the Now, Feb. 19.
Charges of "fear-mongering" and "whipping up hysteria," levelled against me by NDP MP Svend Robinson in your newspaper are completely out of line.
Mr. Robinson argues, rather weakly, that Bill C-250, which seeks to criminalize criticism of homosexual conduct, would never be used to suppress freedom of speech and freedom of religion because the Criminal Code requires the consent of the appropriate provincial attorney general in order to commence prosecution.
Apparently Mr. Robinson fails to appreciate how the law will be used if amended by his proposed bill. While it is true, criminal proceedings require the consent of an attorney general, no such consent is required for civil lawsuits or injunctions. And that is the route that will be taken by some activists, already on record claiming the Christian religion foments hatred of homosexuals.
In light of current jurisprudence, where religious faith seems to be permitted within the walls of a church, but is banned from the public forum, I must remain skeptical, despite Mr. Robinson's assurances.
Need I remind Mr. Robinson that the views I've expressed are those of the vast majority of my constituents? His accusations are therefore less against me than the people of Surrey Central, and, for that matter, the people of Canada who have voiced their strong opposition to C-250.
MP Gurmant Grewal